OAFE: your #1 source for toy reviews
B u y   t h e   t o y s ,   n o t   t h e   h y p e .

what's new?
reviews
articulation
figuretoons
customs
message board
links
blog
FAQ
accessories
main
search
 


Points of Articulation

Poe
Poe Ghostal
Imperial Monsters

If you were a young boy in the late 1970s and early 1980s, chances are you were quite familiar with the crown logo of Imperial Toys. From the admittedly limited perspective as a 6-year-old boy, Imperial was known for one thing: rubber dinosaurs. Imperial specialized in those solid rubber dinosaurs you'd find in convenience stores, pharmacies, and the metal floor bins of toy stores like Child World. They usually sold for about a buck. Those dinosaurs were tough bastards; you could throw them against the wall all day long and they wouldn't get a scratch.

The sculpts and paint applications were crude even by contemporary standards and there was nary a point of articulation to be found on them, but when I was a kid that hardly mattered. The rubbery feel of the dinosaurs' skin, coupled with their Godzilla-like indestructibility, made them the preeminent dinosaur toys of my youth.

A lot of the Imperial dinosaurs were of questionable paleontological validity. Tyrannosaurs with stegosaur-like plates and apatosaurs (which we called brontosaurs in my day) with pointy teeth were common. My particular favorites were a small yellow tyrannosaur (now residing in my Toy Shrine), a duck-billed dinosaur thing, and a black creature that was sort of a cross between a frog and an allosaur who I called "Bumpy."

In addition to dinosaurs, Imperial produced a whole assortment of creepy-crawlies - giant spiders, sharks, squid, gorillas, and whatnot. But in the mid-1980s, Imperial attempted to branch out their rubber monster toy line to licensed properties. I distinctly remember coming home to my parents' apartment in South Weymouth to find my mother and my aunt talking in the kitchen, an Imperial Godzilla toy on the table between them. I was both pleased (a new toy!) and a bit disappointed; Imperial's figure looked a little shoddy next to the hyper-realistic Bandai Godzilla figures my parents had generously bought me from the famous Mr. Big's Toyland in Waltham (to this day, I can't hear the name Waltham without thinking of Mr. Big's Toyland, which has been gone for nearly 20 years).

Even more intriguing, however, was the fact that Imperial's Godzilla could move at the arms, legs and tail. This was a whole new level of innovation for Imperial's dinosaur army.

But Godzilla wasn't the only movie monster in Imperial's stable. He was joined by a King Kong figure, who moved only at the arms (I remember for some reason my parents bought this for my sister, perhaps in an attempt to get me to play with her - the result was that she wasn't much interested in it and I more or less claimed it as my own). They also managed to snag the Universal Monsters license and created figures of Frankenstein's Monster, Dracula, the Wolf Man, and the Mummy. (Why no Creature from the Black Lagoon? Surely the Creature design would have been a no-brainer for the monster makers at Imperial.)

At some point as a kid, I snagged Frankenstein's Monster. I think I also had Dracula at one point. Frankie usually served as an antagonist for my various other action figures (just as the dinosaurs did for He-Man).

Unlike Godzilla and King Kong, Frankie and Drac have a somewhat decent sculpt and paint application. Frank bears a passing resemblance to Boris Karloff, while Dracula is a reasonable approximation of Bela Lugosi. Both figures moved at the shoulders and neck. At the time, these were pretty good as far as Universal Monster toys went, and in my opinion, for their size, the best thing until Sideshow's action figures a decade later.


previous Articulation articles
2009
8 Apr | How to Fix Universe Classics Ironhide
7 Mar | OAFEnet Presents TF-Parallax: Orion
2 Feb | What's happened to NECA?
12 Jan | What I bought - 2008

2008
31 Dec | Toy of the Year
16 Nov | I HAD THE POWER!!!
31 Oct | The Untold History of the Oktober Guard
30 Jul | The Toy Alphabet of Women
12 Jun | The Toy Alphabet of Cool
11 May | The March of the Elephants
12 Jan | What I bought - 2007

2007
31 Dec | Toy of the Year
14 Oct | OAFEnet Presents JaAm
31 Aug | ToyFare's Top 100 Toys
28 Jul | An Open Letter to Mattel
31 May | The Word on the Street (Dates)
28 Feb | What I miss about Toy Fair

2006
31 Dec | Toy of the Year
8 Nov | Quitcher Bitchin'
21 Sep | Hasbro Legends
15 Jul | First Appearance Thing Addendum
11 Apr | Cutural Bias
14 Feb | Alternate History
14 Jan | Is Palisades Dead?

2005
30 Dec | Toy of the Year
30 Nov | Final Curtain
25 Jul | A Figure Factory Primer
29 Jun | An Open Letter To Palisades
1 Apr | At My Signal, "Unleashed" Hell
28 Jan | Whatever A Spider Can

2004
30 Dec | Toy of the Year
28 Nov | War on a Different Front
28 Oct | Whywolf?
1 Sep | KIMOTA! Neil Gaiman vs. Todd McFarlane, Part 2
23 Jul | I Like Big Box and I Cannot Lie
2 May | There Can Be Only One
22 Apr | Not a gloomy Bird of Prey
23 Mar | Take it out and play with it
4 Feb | Days of Future Pastimes
11 Jan | This town ain't big enough for the both of us!

2003
24 Dec | Santa's Little Helpers
2 Dec | Toy of the Year
14 Nov | Anatomy of a Review
19 Oct | Get Your "Eek!" On
27 Sep | Moving at the Big Five
7 Aug | Local Custom
17 Jul | KIMOTA! Neil Gaiman vs. Todd McFarlane
17 Jun | An Open Letter to Art Asylum
7 May | Clawing Your Way to the Top
16 Mar | Must You Be So Critical?
27 Feb | Not Everything Demands a Toy
25 Jan | An Open Letter to KB Toys

2002
8 Dec | Toy of the Year
20 Nov | Making a MOCery of Things
1 Oct | Hail to the King, Baby?
25 Aug | Variations on a Theme
15 Aug | The Toy Glossary


that exchange rate's a bitch

© 2001 - present, OAFE. All rights reserved.
Need help? Mail Us!